Creating an API Standard for Election Administration Systems to Strengthen U.S. Democracy
Author: Greg Novick
To bring nationwide access to voter tools, the Biden-Harris administration should direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to establish a standard application programming interface (API) for election administration systems.
Our democracy is most representative when the greatest number of Americans vote, but access is hindered by manual, form-based operations that make it difficult for citizens to register to vote or access a ballot. As Americans faced a global pandemic and an overwhelmed postal service, the 2020 election amplified the importance of digital tools for voters to register, apply for absentee ballots, and track their ballot status. It also highlighted the deficiencies in (or lack of) these capabilities from locality to locality. Further, state legislatures have begun passing sweeping voter suppression measures that further limit ballot access.
With the next federal election rapidly approaching in 2022, the time to take steps at the federal level to expand voting access is now. While proposed legislation would mandate making these functions available online, without incentives or standards, these tools would remain available only on local government websites, which suffer from discoverability and usability hurdles. Creating a standard API for election administration systems will enable civic groups and other outside organizations to create consistent, discoverable and innovative nationwide voter tools that interoperate directly with local voter rolls, resulting in a more participatory electorate and a stronger, more representative democracy.
About the Author
Greg Novick was most recently an engineering director at Apple, where he was responsible for software for Apple Watch. Previously, Greg led iOS engineering at Facebook and was an engineering manager at Apple. He has a B.S. in Computer Science from Stanford University.
The views expressed are the personal views of the author and are not necessarily the views of the Office of Management and Budget, the Executive Office of the President, or the United States government.