Alex Marthews and Catherine Tucker
In the 20th century, the costly nature of surveillance made it easier to maintain Constitutional guarantees protecting U.S. persons from mass surveillance. In the 21st century, digitization of our everyday lives and communications has sharply reduced surveillance costs —and indeed, changed the nature of surveillance itself. The core responsibility of any President is to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution,” but recently unsealed federal court rulings show that intelligence agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National Security Agency (NSA) are routinely accessing the digital communications of U. S. persons and otherwise using digital surveillance in ways that violate Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights against “unreasonable searches and seizures.” To fulfill their oath of office, the next president should take concrete steps to reform federal operations with respect to digital surveillance. This is important not only for protecting basic American rights, but also for diplomatic relations with key foreign allies. Instituting meaningful protections against government surveillance in the United States would have the significant diplomatic benefit of helping reestablish the credibility of American calls for other countries to adhere to high human-rights standards.
About the Authors
Alex Marthews is a US-UK dual citizen living in Massachusetts and a father of four. Since 2014, he has served as the National Chair of Restore The Fourth, a grassroots nonprofit advocacy group that opposes mass government surveillance. His published research includes articles on the chilling effects of surveillance, problems of identity on the blockchain, and antitrust and social media.
Catherine Tucker is the Sloan Distinguished Professor of Management and a Professor of Marketing at MIT Sloan. She is an expert in the economics of digital data and privacy.