The Energy Transition Workforce Initiative
Summary
The energy transition underway in the United States presents a unique set of opportunities to put Americans back to work through the deployment of new technologies, infrastructure, energy efficiency, and expansion of the electricity system to meet our carbon goals. Unlike many previous industrial transitions, the U.S. can directly influence the pace of change and create new jobs while old ones are phasing out. The next administration should launch the Energy Transition Workforce Initiative to put Americans back to work with well-paying, union jobs building a stronger, more climate-resilient nation.
The Energy Transition Workforce Initiative proposes a collection of actions that the incoming administration could enact on Day One and through the Administration’s first year. This set of actions largely tracks the following three principles:
- Utilize carbon-reduction investments – such as energy efficiency upgrades, infrastructure investments and electrification technologies – as economic development tools in under-served communities and those impacted by the loss of fossil-fuel jobs.
- Expand our existing energy workforce training system to respond to all communities experiencing dislocations and high levels of unemployment, while also providing opportunity and training for the additional employees necessary to complete the energy transition.
- Allocate $20 billion over the next decade specifically to retrain the existing energy workforce with a focus on their impacted communities.
With success, the Energy Transition Workforce Initiative will ensure that the U.S. captures all the opportunities presented by the energy transition for the middle and working class.
At the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, Dr. Glaser is paving the way for cutting-edge energy storage and battery technologies to scale up.
Outside of loans, the federal government can do more to support the restart and ensure other nuclear plants continue generating clean baseload energy for as long as safely possible.
The ongoing failure of the U.S. to invest comes at a time when our competitors continue to up their investments in science.
Science funding agencies are biased against risk, making transformative research difficult to fund. Forecast-based approaches to grantmaking could improve funding outcomes for high-risk, high-reward research.